« IELTS Writing Task 2: firstly, secondly, finally | Main | IELTS Speaking: is accent important? »

April 16, 2015

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Hi Simon,

1. This is my introduction: The pie chart illustrates how Republic of Korea, Sweden and United Kingdom cope with bad rubbish by several methods.
2.I suppose 2 things which should be summarised are if they recycling or carry on chemical treatment and dumping at sea.

Best regard.

The given chart compares three countries, Republic if Korea, Sweden, and The UK, in terms of 5 different waste disposal methods for dangerous goods.
Overall, it is clear that hazardous wastes are mainly disposed by using landfill method in the UK, where as Korean people mostly recycle them. Of all five means of waste disposal, Damping waste into sea and chemical treatment are used only in the UK.

Hi,
1- The pie charts compare UK, Sweden, and The Republic of Korea in
terms of the ways used to deal with harmful waste products.

2- It is clear that burying waste products under the ground is the main way to deal with these products in the UK and Sweden, while Republic of Korea relies mainly on recycling. It is also noticed that dumping the waste products at sea or treating it chemically is only used in the UK .

1. The pie charts compare five different methods of hazardous waste
treatment in three countries.

2. Overall, the UK and Sweden mainly relied on the landfill for their rubbish, whereas Korea recycled more than half of its waste output. It is noticeable that the UK didn't use the recycling method and instead, chemical treatment and dumping which the others didn't use.

Hi,
My answers as below:

1.The pie char presents the ways of disposing rubbish in the UK, Sweden and The Republic of Korea.

2.Firstly,United Kingdom uses multiple ways to dispose the wasted. Secondly,The Republic of Korea and Sweden prefer recycling ways to deal with rubbish except United Kingdom.

Paraphrase:The diagram illustrates different techniques adopted by three countries for the disposal of hazardous waste products.
main points:overall, disposing off dangerous wastes through landfill is the most practised method.But korea is using recycling method more efficiently.Britain administration also uses chemical treatment and dumping to sea methods for this purpose and is distinguished from others in this regard.

The diagram illustrates five different methods that are used for the disposal of the hazardous waste products used by Korea ,Sweden and Uk.

Among the five different methods the recycle method is highly used in korea than sweden whereas Uk instead of using recycle method they preferred the method of chemical treatment and dumping at sea. Uk used the underground method efficiently than sweden and korea.Among these three country disposing the rubbish through fire is less popular than other method.

hi simon please give me feedback

The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.

1. The pie charts compare five different methods of disposing of dangerous waste products in Sweden, Republic of Korea and the UK.

2. Overall, it is clear that the main method used among three countries to get rid of hazardous waste is burying it. It can also be seen that the ways of dealing with dangerous waste in Sweden are exactly the same as Republic of Korea.

Please anyone give me feedback.

The pie charts compare different forms of hazardous waste disposal in three nations.

Overall, Republic of Korea recycles most of the waste produced while the majority of waste outputs are buried underground in Sweden and particularly in the UK. It is noticeable that the UK does not tend to recycle its waste products.

Thank you, Simon. Look forward to seeing your model answer to this task.

The pie charts compare harmful waste management procedure in three different countries;namely: the united kingdom, Sweden and Republic of Korea.

It is clear that in European countries dangerous waste are mostly dumped in underground,whereas in Asian country namely Republic of Korea major portion waste are recycled. It is also noticeable that UK used numbers of different procedures than others to deal with hazardous wastage.

Correction in Last sentence...

****It is also noticeable that UK used numbers of different procedures than others to deal with hazardous WASTES.

The pie charts compare ways in which hazardous materials are treated in three different countries, Great Britain, Republic of Korea and Sweden.

It is obvious that dangerous materials in Great Britain and Sweden are mostly discarded in underground. Recycling, incineration and dumping underground are only methods used in Korea and Sweden for unsafe materials management, while Great Britain in addition uses, chemical treatment and throwing into the ocean of such substances.

Sorry, I don't like unfinished works.

The pie charts compare the way in which hazardous materials are treated in three different countries, Great Britain, Republic of Korea and Sweden.
It is obvious that dangerous materials in Great Britain and Sweden are mostly discarded in underground. Recycling, incineration and dumping underground are only methods used in Korea and Sweden for unsafe materials management, while Great Britain in addition uses, chemical treatment and throwing into the ocean of such substances.
In United Kingdom, 88% of dangerous materials are put underground, while this figure for Sweden and Korea are 55% and 22%, respectively. Sweden burns about a fifth of its risky material, and this method is 9% in Korea and only 2% in United Kingdom.
While Korea recycles about 70% of its dangerous materials, this method is used for treatment of about a fourth of these substances in Sweden. In contrast, Great Britain does not practice any recycling process for its hazardous materials, instead chemical treatment and dumping at the sea are two additional methods that are practiced only in England with mark at 8% for each method.

The three pie charts compare different ways of to dispose hazardous waste material in three different countries.

It can clearly be seen that the majority of the harmful waste products in the UK are buried underground for their disposal and this method is also popular in Sweden to get rid of harmful waste. However, in the Republic of Korea the majority of that waste material gets recycled.

In the United Kingdom just over 4/5th of the waste is disposed of using landfill sites, while the figures for Sweden and the Republic of Korea stood at 55% and 22% respectively. Incineration is also used to destroy a significant portion of toxic rubbish, at 20% in Sweden and 9% in the Republic of Korea, whereas only 2% of the notorious waste is burnt in the United Kingdom.

A major part of the lethal waste material gets recycled in Korea, similarly a quarter of the harmful waste products is reused in Sweden. By contrast, none of the toxic waste material in England goes for recycling, and instead chemical treatment and dumping at sea is used to discard some of the dangerous wastage, 8% each respectively. It is interesting to note that the latter two methods are not used in Sweden and Korea.

(I'm not sure it was about toxic waste material or normal rubbish)

of * should be deleted in the introduction.

Hi Simon,

The pie charts compare the ways used to deal with hazardous materials in three countries.

Overall, it is clearly seen that the UK and Sweden are mostly rely on landfill method for their toxic substances. However, it is interestingly seem that Republic of Korea deal with recycling way for its waste products.

The pie charts illustrates the different methods of toxic waste management in Republic of Korea, sweden and the UK.

It is clear that majority of the waste in the uk and sweden are dumped underground. However, Republic of korea recycles large proportion of the dangerous waste products.

The pie charts illustrate various methods to destroy waste materials by Republic of Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

It can be clearly seen that all three countries have the common way of damaging waste products, which are by dumping them underground and by incineration. Disposing waste material underground has occupied the majority percentage for all the countries.

1. The pie charts give information about methods used to solve waste products in Republic of Korea, Sweden and United Kingdom.

2. The overall picture presented by the charts is the diversity of measures which three countries are using. An important point to mention is that both Republic of Korea and the UK have the same choices in waste treatment.

1.
The pie charts compare the different ways to treat the hazardous waste products in three countries, namely, Republic Korea, Sweden and United Kingdom.
2.
Overall, dumping underground is the most common way to treat waste in Sweden and United Kingdom, while recycling is the most favorite method in Republic Korea. United Kingdom also uses chemical treatment and dumping at sea to treat waste product, whereas these methods are not applied in Sweden and Republic Korea.

3. I also finish my essay with two body paragraphs:
The figures for dumping underground are 55% and 82% in Sweden and United Kingdom respectively, while underground - dumped waste is 22% in Republic Korea. Recycling in Republic Korea is 69%, which is the majority method in this country. In Sweden, recycled waste products are 25%, compared with no reused waste in United Kingdom.
Burning is the less common method in these three countries, which is 9%, 20% and 2% for Republic Korea, Sweden and United Kingdom as order. Chemical treatment and dumping at sea are used as the same percentage, 8%, in United Kingdom. Both Republic Korea and Sweden do not use these ways to treat their waste products.

185 words, 9 sentences.
I am looking forward to hear the comment from all of you. Thanks for your help.

Hi simon

1. The pie charts show how to handling trash between Republic of Korea, Sweden and UK.

2. Republic of Korea and Sweden only use three methods to dump trash. But UK has more way except recycling though.
More percentage of recycling is much less percentage of underground. So if each country try to increase of mount of recycling, they would reduce quantity of burried trash.

It's my first post on ielts-simon.com.
I've just started IELTS study last Monday.
I'm really excited!
Thank you simon XD

The three pie charts compare the methods of dealing with produced hazardous waste in three different countries.
Overall, in UK and Sweden majority of waste disposal are buried underground, while Korea is managing to recycle most of these unsafe materials. It is also worth noting that only Britain implemented a range of ways of discarding harmful waste materias, including chemical treatment and draining produced waste into sea.

INTRODUCTION: The three pie charts compare five disposals of hazardous wastes in three countries, namely, Republic of Korea, Sweden and Britain.

MAIN FEATURES : UK have applied all five ways to handle those hazardous wastes , whereas other two countries have just similarly used three methods.
-The overwhelming majority of underground (82%) was used to place hazardous waste in UK

- A mere 2% of recycling treatment was used to deal with dangerous waste in UK

The pie charts present the different methods of hazardous waste management among three countries.

dear Mi,
your task has been presented skillfully. I appreciate you.

The three pie charts below illustrate the means used by three countries to deal with their hazardous waste products.

Overall, a significant amount of waste is buried underground in the UK, followed by Sweden which also adoptes this means to deal with most waste. Recycling is not a very common method for waste treatment in the UK, but it is the most preferable way for the Republic of Korea.

The pie charts shows different ways on how hazardous waste are disposed in Republic of Korea, United Kingdom, and Sweden.

Overall, majority of hazardous waste in United Kingdom are buried underground so as in Sweden. However, the Republic of Korea recycles most of their harmful waste.

The pie charts compare five different methods to process harmful disposal products in the UK, Swedia and Korea.

In general, it is clear that the underground disposal method is used in larger proportion in most of the countries, while republic of Korea was the only country that recycle waste as major method to deal with dangerous disposal.

Mr Simon. Please attach your model answer in here. It will be more useful for us

1.The piecharts illustrate different methods of handling the harmful waste products in three different countries(Republic of korea,Sweden and England.
2.Overall, dumping the waste products underground was the main method used in Sweden and England wherease majority of Korean people dealt with those products through recycling.Chemical treatment and dumping in sea was the process which was applied only in England.

Dear friend,

Thank you. I am happy to hear that.
It is my pleasure to receive any comment from all of you.

Hi Simon,
Here is my introduction.
1. The piecharts indicate the ways local people deal with dangerous waste products in three countries namely Republic of Korea, Sweden and United Kingdom.
2. Overall, it is apparent that all these three countries prefer to handle waste by burying trash. United Kingdom uses more ways to deal with dangerous waste compared with Korea and Sweden, however, they do not pay attention to recycle.

My exam is on saturday in Saudi Arabia

I HOPE SOMEONE WILL SHARE THEIR QUESTIONS WHICH IS SIMILAR WITH OUR ZONE .I LOOK FORWARD TO IT

The pie charts illustrate the disposal of harmful waste in Sweden, the UK and the Republic of Korea

Introduction: The pie charts illustrate the different methods of harmful waste disposal in Sweden, Republic of Korea and the UK.

Conclusion: Overall, putting waste in landfill sites is highly favoured in the UK and Sweden but to a lesser amount in the Republic of Korea.

The pie charts compare the different ways of disposal of notorious waste products in three different countries namely Sweden,Republic of Korea and the United Kingdom

Hi Simon,

Please give me comment for the below writing:

The pie chart provide data on methods used for treatment of hazardous wastes in three countries (Republic of Korea, Sweden and UK).

It is immediately apparent that the majority of wastes is treated by disposing underground in UK and Sweden, while Korea almost recycles harmful wastes. It is also worth noting that dumping at sea is an additional method used only in UK.

Hi Simon,

I correct some mistakes in my above writing:

The pie chart provides data on methods used for treatment of hazardous wastes in three countries (Republic of Korea, Sweden and UK).

Overall, the majority of wastes is treated by disposing underground in UK and Sweden, while Korea almost recycles harmful wastes. It is also worth noting that dumping at sea is an additional method used only in UK.

the charts provide information about the different methods used to get rid of harmful waste in three countries; Korea, Sweden an the UK. It clearly can be seen that while most hazardous materials are recycled in Korea, the majority of waste products in both Sweden and the UK are buried underground.

hi simon,

1. The pie chart illustrates the disposal method of hazardous waste of UK, Sweden and Republic of Korea.

The pie charts given illustrate the methods employed to deal with dangerous waste in three countries (Korea, Sweden and the UK).
Overall, compared with Korea and Sweden that maily dispose hazardous materials by recycling, incineration and underground, the UK, not bringing the waste to the recycle process, has more ways to tackle the waste.

My speaking test is compel eye earlier
What are the reasons behind it?

My speaking module was completed early
What are the reasons Behind it?

The pie charts illustrates the different method of disposal of harmful waste adopted by republic of Korea, united kingdom and Sweden respectively.

1..The pie charts demonstrate different means, by which harzordous waste products are handled in three countries.

2. It is obvious that the majority of harmful wastes are buried underground in the UK and Sweden, while Korea recycles most of their dangerous waste.

Hi Simon,

Could you please give me a link to this pie charts again?

Always thank you for your perfect model answers!

Hi Sean,

Sorry that link disappeared. You can see the pie charts on the website linked below:

http://www.ielts-house.com/uploads/1_45_5_Afarinesh%20Writing%20Sample.pdf

Thanks you, Simon!

The pie chart compares three different countries in terms of the method used to cope with hazardous waste.

Hi Simon

Pie chart link is broken.

FYI

Sorry you already shared a new link in comments.

Hi Simon,
Actually I need your help.I am very weak in writing. But i have very little time for my exam. I am going to take part in ielts exam on 10 december. Could you please suggest me how i should prepare myself within one month?specially how i can improve my writing skill? I have already bought your ielts target band 7.please help me.

hey, can anyone share the picture of this task? i am not able to watch it. thanks

The comments to this entry are closed.