I'll finish the waste chart question next Thursday, but today I want to show you a 'real' example of some writing in the style of writing task 1.
Here are some sentences from a BBC article about the UK population:
- The UK population was estimated to stand at 65.6 million in 2016.
- 2016 saw the biggest UK population rise for 70 years.
- Over the decade from mid-2016, projected growth in England's population is put at 5.9%, for Northern Ireland the figure is 4.2%, while for Scotland and Wales the percentages are 3.2% and 3.1% respectively.
- The study puts projected UK population growth between 2015 and 2040 at 16%, compared with 10% growth for France and 4% for Germany.
- The study also says that the number of people aged 85 and over will have doubled from 1.6m in 2016 to 3.2m in 2041.
The reason why I wanted to share these sentences is that they are written in a very similar style to the style that I use in my model answers here on the blog. You'll see that I've highlighted some typical task 1 vocabulary.
If you'd like to read the full article, click here. You might even notice a few mistakes in the original article - it was probably written too quickly!
The BBC article seems to "recount detail mechanically with no clear overview" ??
It also seems to state percentages quite baldly: for instance -
"for Northern Ireland the figure is 4.2%, while for Scotland and Wales the percentages are 3.2% and 3.1% respectively."
instead of :
"for Northern Ireland the figure is 4.2%, while for Scotland and Wales the percentages are significantly lower at 3.2% and 3.1% respectively."
Posted by: aziz | December 01, 2017 at 00:01
Hi, Simon,
•The study also says that the numbers of people aged 85 and over will have doubled from 1.6m in 2016 to 3.2m in 2041.
In this sentence, the numbers of ... , here the numbers should be used as number?
Angella
Posted by: Angella Liu | December 01, 2017 at 03:16
@Angella
https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=%22the+numbers+of+people%22&tbm=bks&lr=lang_en&gws_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=wQchWtmrNMjt0ATAtrGgDQ
"number of people" is much commoner though.
Wiktionary suggests that "numbers" is not simply the plural of "number" but also has a second distinct meaning: "many individuals as a group."
Posted by: Khe | December 01, 2017 at 07:58
Angella,
Yes, "number of" is best in this context. Well noticed.
It looks to me like the article was written quickly and not checked by an editor!
Posted by: Simon | December 01, 2017 at 12:26
Aziz,
I agree that the article could be written and organised in a better way. I can only assume that it's aim was only to communicate some quick facts. We can do a better job in terms of structure when we write our task 1 reports!
However, I still think it's useful to see a 'real life' example of the typical vocabulary and the types of sentences that I often use and recommend.
Posted by: Simon | December 01, 2017 at 12:32
Hi simon,
Thank you very much for the immense support you provide for the ielts students from this wesite.
Can I know is it appropriate to use below three phrases for ielts writing task 1.
1. ”At the first glance it can be seen that” instead of “Overall”
2.” the opposite was true in the case of other” instead of “as opposed”
3. “carefully analysis of the graph “ instead of “In detail”
Posted by: Dumidu Presad | December 03, 2017 at 11:16
@Dumidu Presad
1) Simon:
"Although the meaning of "glance" is to look quickly, this word isn't appropriate in this context. Just use: "It is clear that" or "it is noticeable that"."
http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2016/01/ielts-writing-task-1-dont-use-these-phrases.html
2) "as opposed to" continues the same sentence:
https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=%22as+opposed+to%22&lr=lang_en&dcr=0&tbs=lr:lang_1en&tbm=bks&ei=nz8kWqLmJ8eZ8wWY9JG4Dw&start=30&sa=N
"The opposite was true in the case of other ..." begins a new sentence:
https://www.google.co.nz/search?lr=lang_en&dcr=0&tbs=lr%3Alang_1en&tbm=bks&ei=ez8kWueHBcKj8QWUj7PQBg&btnG=Search&q=%22opposite+was+true+in+the+case+of+%22
3) “careful
lyanalysis of the graph “Again, this phrase would start a new sentence, whereas "in detail" is simply an adverbial or adjectival phrase.
https://www.google.co.nz/search?lr=lang_en&dcr=0&tbs=lr%3Alang_1en&tbm=bks&ei=50AkWvfKK4n88AXSir7wCQ&btnG=Search&q=%22careful+analysis+of+the+graph%22
Simon:
"NOTE:
The overall problem that I'm highlighting in this lesson is that so many students think that "difficult" linking phrases are the key to a high score. They are not!
Remember: the examiner wants to read your description of the information shown on the chart. Use short, simple linking phrases, and spend more time describing the information in detail. This is the key to a high score. Look through my task 1 lessons to see how I focus on the information rather than the linking."
According to Simon, "The most striking feature is ... " is okay.
http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2017/04/ielts-writing-task-1-how-to-write-the-overview.html
Posted by: Khe | December 03, 2017 at 18:32
It’s unfortunate that we can’t access any bbc links in Vietnam:((
Posted by: Minh Ngoc | December 05, 2017 at 02:55
Hi Simon,
I just have a quick question on the last bullet point. Should it have been 'will have doubled from 1.6m to 3.2m by 2041' ?
Many thanks,
Trang.
Posted by: Trang | December 12, 2017 at 03:23
@Trang
Both versions are good; except that in your version the start year is not specified; and that "by 2041" means that it might double before 2041 (by=on or before).
Posted by: Kati | December 12, 2017 at 14:39
hi simon ,
my exam is on 20th january .can yougive me some advise please.
Posted by: julie jacob | January 03, 2018 at 17:56
hi simon,
do you have a whatsup group which is mainly for ielts candidates
Posted by: julie jacob | January 03, 2018 at 17:57