It's frustrating to see students who rely on textbooks to teach them everything about the English language. Why read an article in an 'upper intermediate' textbook (that was probably written 10 years ago) when you could be reading 'real' articles in newspapers or on the Internet?
Read articles because you find them interesting, not because they have been written to demonstrate a particular grammar point.
A suggestion: if you've read anything interesting recently, put a link to it (and maybe a quick summary if you have time) in the comments area below this lesson.
My favorite website is TED.com
You can approach a lot of information here.
Posted by: Dang Nguyen | December 04, 2017 at 10:32
Recently I have been interested with speeches of Simone Sinek that realted to empathy , leadership , side effect fot technology and social media .
Posted by: Ali M Meften | December 04, 2017 at 12:58
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/smartphone-internet-addiction-phone-imbalance-brain-anxiety-tiredness-study-research-a8084146.html
Posted by: Lài Trần | December 04, 2017 at 14:41
hi Simon,
First of all thank you for this wonderful website.
I have a suggestion about website which contain reading topics depend on our interest.
Stumbleupon.com
First,people choose their interest and website bring the arcticles which related to them.
There are many interest on there and mobile application is available.
Posted by: AOruk | December 04, 2017 at 16:52
Dear Simon/sjm
Sorry if Im posting here,wondering whether we lose marks if we use a few idioms or phrases in our writings?
Thanks for your guidance and efforts.
Posted by: Sana | December 04, 2017 at 18:21
Hello Simon and everyone,
I have a question. In listening, if the answer is singular (like Thursday) and for some unknown reason we write it in plural (Thursdays) do we lose marks?
Posted by: Mahnaz | December 05, 2017 at 00:10
@Sana
per Simon:
"topic vocabulary - words and phrases that are directly relevant to the specific topic of the question. This is the kind of vocabulary that impresses examiners."
http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2013/11/ielts-vocabulary-idioms.html
http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2017/07/ielts-writing-task-2-proverbs-and-idioms.html
http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2011/11/ielts-advice-avoid-proverbs-and-clich%C3%A9s.html
http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2011/12/ielts-vocabulary-topic-specific-vocabulary.html
http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2011/07/ielts-advice-topic-vocabulary-is-the-key.html
http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2015/02/ielts-advice-collocations-and-topic-vocabulary.html
http://ielts-simon.com/ielts-help-and-english-pr/2016/05/ielts-vocabulary-topic-list.html
If by "idioms" you mean phrases that are often used in academic writing, like "in terms of", or "account for", then these would be quite natural in Task 1 or 2.
If you mean topic-specific phrases such as "global warming", "inappropriate behavior/behaviour", then again very natural in the right context.
If you mean a portable idiom like "the lion's share", well, yes it comes up in books, but I am not sure whether an individual examiner would react favorably or not if used in Task 1; so why bother?
Posted by: kali | December 05, 2017 at 00:18
Re "the lion's share": this seems to suggest that the outcome is somehow unfair to the weaker parties, or there is an element of intimidation. That would make it hard to use correctly.
Posted by: kali | December 05, 2017 at 00:46
Recently, I have started reading "Sherlock Holmes".
It is interesting, but a little difficult for me, because some vocabularies are not familiar to me. Even though, reading it still delights me.
http://www.public-library.uk/dailyebook/Sherlock%20Holmes%20Complete.pdf
Posted by: Emma | December 05, 2017 at 00:52
Thanks dear Kali,
I mean that for example if we use take it for granted or take with a grain of salt and so forth correctly in task 2, will we be penalized?
Posted by: Sana | December 05, 2017 at 01:43
@Sana
The two phrases you mention crop up regularly in books.
The task 2 band descriptor states:
"uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features".
So personally I do not see why you would be penalized if they truly fit the context; otherwise ...
But the main point is that Simon repeatedly states that it is topic-specific vocabulary and phrases that really matter.
Posted by: kali | December 05, 2017 at 03:20
@Sana
"the lion's share" is listed as a cliche here:
https://www.writingenglish.com/cliches.htm
"take it with a grain/pinch of salt" might well fall into that category too.
At the end of the day the fact of the matter is that, when all is said and done, and push comes to shove, in this day and age, in the final analysis, cliches like these might, to all intents and purposes, not help your score in the current climate !
Posted by: kali | December 05, 2017 at 13:39
Can you please share some links/sites where we can read comprehensive articles on latest happenings around the world.
I am not talking about news articles here as I think they use a very formal style and it doesnt quite feel like as we are reading a story or an argument in a flow.
So kindly tell us about where can we find understable and easy-to-follow content which would help yo improve our writing and reading both.
Thanks
Posted by: Sehrish Taufeeq | December 06, 2017 at 14:00
Can you please share some links/sites where we can read comprehensive articles on latest happenings around the world.
I am not talking about news articles here as I think they use a very formal style and it doesnt quite feel like as if we are reading a story or an argument in a flow.
So kindly tell us about where can we find understable and easy-to-follow content which would help us to improve our writing and reading both.
Thanks
Posted by: Sehrish Taufeeq | December 06, 2017 at 14:03
@Sehrish Taufeeq
I would suggest you persevere with well-written news articles, as the level of formality is roughly what is expected in IELTS reading and writing, although it takes time and persistent effort to acquire the vocabulary.
One possible source is:
https://www.theguardian.com/world
The sections on "development", "environment", "opinion" are especially worth-while and relevant. Bear in mind that the paragraphs have been broken up into shorter segments for ease of reading online.
Posted by: kali | December 06, 2017 at 17:38
Hi simon,
Thanks for sharing your methodical way to attack questions in IELTS.i have a question regarding reading GT section.
While practicing i found myself little slow.i found GT materials are lesser compared to academic.so can i practice them with timer for third section? Else pl suggest some way.
I need really good score n exams r scheduled for 16th dec.
Thanks in advance.
Divya
Posted by: [email protected] | December 07, 2017 at 05:53